The role of external penetration tests in cybersecurity compliance

Unlike vulnerability scans, which identify known weaknesses, penetration tests actively attempt to exploit vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and gaps in your defences, mimicking the tactics used by cyber criminals and other threat actors.

The role of external penetration tests in cybersecurity compliance
Do not index
Do not index

Understanding External Penetration Tests

An external penetration test is a simulated cyberattack performed by independent security professionals to assess how well your systems can withstand real-world attack from outside your network. Unlike vulnerability scans, which help you identify known weaknesses, penetration tests actively attempt to exploit hidden vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and gaps in your defences, mimicking the tactics used by cyber criminals and other threat actors.
Penetration testers will often use the same tools and tactics that attackers might deploy, but in a controlled, authorised, and responsible manner. The goal is not just to find theoretical risks, but to demonstrate whether those risks can be exploited, and how severe the consequences could be if they were.
 

Why External Penetration Tests are Required for Compliance

Many compliance frameworks require external penetration testing because they provide a much more realistic, thorough evaluation of an organisation’s security posture than internal assessments alone. Standards such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS and Cyber Essentials often require or strongly recommend penetration testing as part of ongoing risk management efforts.
Compliance standards recognise that technology environments are more dynamic than ever before. New vulnerabilities emerge, configurations drift, and threats evolve. Penetration tests help verify that your controls remain effective against current attack techniques, and that any weaknesses are identified and resolved before an attacker finds them.
There are several key reasons why compliance frameworks insist on external penetration testing:
  • Independent verification: Internal teams may unintentionally overlook issues due to familiarity or assumptions. External testers being a fresh perspective and specialised expertise, increasing the chances of uncovering hidden vulnerabilities.
  • Real-world attack simulation: Unlike purely theoretical assessments, penetration tests simulate the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by actual threat actors. This provides a more accurate measure of how resilient your systems are against real attacks.
  • Validation of controls: Many compliance standards require not only that specific security controls exist, but that they are effective in practice. Penetration tests serve as practical validation that controls such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, access controls, and patch management processes are functioning as intended.
  • Demonstrating due diligence: Regulators, auditors, clients, and insurers increasingly expect businesses to go beyond paper-based compliance. Penetration testing demonstrates that an organisation is proactively identifying and addressing security weaknesses, rather than simply trusting that controls are sufficient.
  • Risk prioritisation: Not all vulnerabilities carry the same level of risk. Penetration tests help organisations understand which vulnerabilities are most likely to be exploited and what the real-world consequences could be, allowing for more informed risk management decisions.
 

What Businesses Can Expect During a Penetration Test

For businesses preparing for their first external penetration test, the process may seem intimidating from the outside, but it actually follows a structured approach designed to be thorough and collaborative.
Scoping: The testing form will begin by working with you to define the scope of the engagement. This means identifying which systems, networks, applications, and endpoints will be tested. External penetration tests typically focus on systems accessible from the internet, such as web applications, VPNs, email servers, and cloud infrastructure.
Rules of engagement: Arguments will be made about when testing will occur, what methods are allowed, how deeply testers can probe systems, and how findings will be communicated. The goal is to strike a balance between thorough testing with operating safety.
Testing: The actual testing phase may last several days to a few weeks depending on the scope of the test. Testers will attempt to identify and exploit vulnerabilities, simulate different types of attacks, and assess how far an attacker could potentially penetrate your environment.
Reporting: At the end of the test, the testers will provide a detailed report outlining their findings. this includes identified vulnerabilities, how they were exploited, potential impacts, and recommended remediation steps. The report becomes a valuable resource for improving your security posture and demonstrating compliance to auditors.
Remediation and retesting: Many compliance standards expect not only that vulnerabilities are identified, but that they are addressed effectively. After remediation efforts, a follow-up assessment may be conducted to verify that fixes have been properly implemented.
 

Typical Finding During a Penetration Test

While every organisation is different, some issues are commonly discovered during external penetration tests. these often include:
  • Unpatched software and outdated systems: Attackers frequently exploit known vulnerabilities in software that has not been updated.
  • Misconfigured cloud services: Cloud platforms often have security options that are improperly configured, leaving sensitive data exposed.
  • Weak authentication mechanisms: Inadequate password policies, exposed credentials, or poorly secured authentication systems can provide easy entry points.
  • Open ports and unnecessary services: Services exposed to the internet that do not need to be public can create unnecessary attack surfaces.
  • Insecure web applications: Flaws such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and insecure sessions management remain common targets.
  • Lack of network segmentation: Poorly segmented networks can allow attackers who breach one system to move laterally and access more critical infrastructure.
Identifying and addressing these types of issues before they can be exploited by attackers is one of the most immediate and valuable outcomes of a penetration test.
 

The Value of Penetration Testing Beyond Compliance

While external penetration tests are often driven by compliance requirements, their value extends far beyond simply meeting audit expectations. They provide actionable insights that help businesses strengthen their defences, reduce risk, and better prepare for real-world threats.
While some may view penetration testing as an unwelcome hurdle, or a costly obligation imposed by compliance standards, it is far better seen as an opportunity, a controlled and valuable chance to uncover weaknesses before an attacker does. Rather than fearing the processes, businesses should embrace it as a proactive investment in their long-term resilience.
In a world of ever-evolving cyber threats, a system that can shine a light on unseen risks, validate your defences, and ultimately strengthen trust, should be seen as a blessing, rather than just another box to tick.
Finn O’Brien

Written by

Finn O’Brien

Operations Manager, OneClickComply