Meet EBA/GL/2019/04 payment security duties with less effort
EBA/GL/2019/04 are the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on ICT and security risk management, issued in November 2019 and applicable from 30 June 2020. They set expectations for governance, information security, ICT operations, change, business continuity and payment service user relationships. Following DORA, amending Guidelines EBA/GL/2025/02 deleted Sections 3.1 to 3.7, leaving only Section 3.8 on payment service user relationship management.
Is EBA/GL/2019/04 right for your organisation?
The retained guidelines are addressed to payment service providers under PSD2, including credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions, account information service providers and exempted institutions. Firms that used the original guidelines for ICT governance, security and continuity now meet those obligations under DORA, but still need the Section 3.8 customer-facing security measures for their payment services.
It is a legal or regulatory requirement for organisations in scope.
- Issued by
- European Banking Authority (EBA)
- Applies since
- 30 June 2020
- Latest change
- Amended by EBA/GL/2025/02, applying from 20 May 2025 at the latest
- Current scope
- Section 3.8, payment service user relationship management
- Legal basis
- Article 95(3) of PSD2 (Directive (EU) 2015/2366)
- Applies to
- Payment service providers under PSD2
- Enforced by
- National competent authorities on a comply or explain basis
- Type
- Guidance (mandatory)
- Region
- EU
- In OneClickComply
- Supported today
OneClickComply makes it simple
EBA/GL/2019/04 is mapped in OneClickComply's control library and available on request, so you can track the Section 3.8 payment service user measures alongside related ICT controls. Policies, evidence and monitoring for security awareness, alerts and customer support processes sit in one place, with the same evidence reused across the other frameworks you follow. Our in-house audit team and Ask an Auditor can help you interpret how the guidelines and DORA fit together.
Requirements covered
98 paragraphs across eight sections (3.1 to 3.8), of which only Section 3.8, paragraphs 92 to 98 on payment service user relationship management, remains in force after the 2025 amendment.
Manual EBA/GL/2019/04 vs. OneClickComply
- Working out which paragraphs still apply after the 2025 amendment takes legal reading time
- Customer alerting, spending limit and support processes are documented in scattered places
- Evidence for supervisors is gathered by hand from screenshots and tickets
- PSU guidance goes stale as new threats and fraud patterns emerge
- Overlap with DORA and PSD2 work leads to duplicated controls and evidence
- A clear control set built around the paragraphs that remain in force
- Policies and procedures for PSU security measures held and versioned in one place
- Evidence collected automatically from connected tools and logged for review
- Continuous monitoring flags when controls drift so guidance and processes stay current
- Mapped controls let one piece of evidence support several frameworks at once
Everything you need for EBA/GL/2019/04
Section 3.8 measures mapped to controls in OneClickComply's control library, available on request
AutoComplete policies for customer security awareness and payment security procedures
Automated evidence collection from 13,000+ integrations, including SaaS admin consoles via Companion
Continuous monitoring with alerts when controls drift
Control mapping so evidence collected once also counts towards related frameworks
Ask an Auditor guidance on how the retained guidelines sit alongside DORA
Three steps to EBA/GL/2019/04 compliance
Connect & scan
Connect your cloud, identity and SaaS tools. OneClickComply checks them against EBA/GL/2019/04 and shows you exactly where you stand.
Fix & generate
OneClickFix remediates technical gaps in one click, and AutoComplete generates EBA/GL/2019/04-aligned policies from your real environment.
Monitor & evidence
Continuous monitoring keeps you compliant, and our in-house audit team is on hand when you need expert guidance.
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2019/04) requirements
The original 28 sections and subsections of Sections 3.1 to 3.7, deleted by EBA/GL/2025/02, plus the seven paragraphs of Section 3.8 that remain in force.
| Reference | Requirement |
|---|---|
| 3.1 | Proportionality |
| 3.2.1 | Governance |
| 3.2.2 | Strategy |
| 3.2.3 | Use of third party providers |
| 3.3.1 | Organisation and objectives |
| 3.3.2 | Identification of functions, processes and assets |
| 3.3.3 | Classification and risk assessment |
| 3.3.4 | Risk mitigation |
| 3.3.5 | Reporting |
| 3.3.6 | Audit |
| 3.4.1 | Information security policy |
| 3.4.2 | Logical security |
| 3.4.3 | Physical security |
| 3.4.4 | ICT operations security |
| 3.4.5 | Security monitoring |
| 3.4.6 | Information security reviews, assessment and testing |
| 3.4.7 | Information security training and awareness |
| 3.5 | ICT operations management |
| 3.5.1 | ICT incident and problem management |
| 3.6.1 | ICT project management |
Always check the official EBA/GL/2019/04 text for the exact wording.
EBA/GL/2019/04 FAQs
What is EBA/GL/2019/04?
EBA/GL/2019/04 are the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on ICT and security risk management. Published in November 2019 and applicable from 30 June 2020, they set out how credit institutions, investment firms and payment service providers should manage ICT and security risks, covering governance, information security, ICT operations, project and change management, business continuity and relationships with payment service users. They replaced the earlier EBA/GL/2017/17 guidelines on security measures for payment services.
Are the EBA ICT guidelines still in force after DORA?
Only partly. Because DORA has applied harmonised ICT risk management rules since 17 January 2025, the EBA issued amending Guidelines EBA/GL/2025/02, applying from 20 May 2025 at the latest. They deleted paragraphs 1 to 91, covering Sections 3.1 to 3.7, and kept Section 3.8 on payment service user relationship management. Broader ICT governance, security, incident and continuity requirements for in-scope firms now come from DORA and its technical standards.
Who must comply with EBA/GL/2019/04 today?
The amended guidelines are addressed to national competent authorities and to payment service providers under PSD2, including credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions, account information service providers, and exempted payment and e-money institutions. In practice this means firms offering payment services to customers in the EU must apply the Section 3.8 measures on customer security awareness, alerts, spending limits and support, as implemented by their national supervisor.
What does Section 3.8 require?
Section 3.8 requires payment service providers to help customers understand payment security risks. Firms should provide security assistance and guidance and update it for new threats, let customers disable specific payment functions where possible, allow agreed spending limits to be adjusted, offer alerts on initiated or failed payment attempts, inform customers of security procedure changes, and provide support for security questions and anomaly reports, explaining how to obtain that help.
What are the penalties for not following the EBA ICT guidelines?
The guidelines do not set fines themselves. Under the EBA Regulation, competent authorities and firms must make every effort to comply, and national supervisors apply them through their own rules and supervisory processes. Shortcomings can therefore lead to supervisory findings or enforcement under national law implementing PSD2. Sanctions depend on the Member State and the supervisor involved, so check your local regulator's approach.
How does EBA/GL/2019/04 relate to DORA and ISO 27001?
DORA now covers the ICT risk management, incident, testing and third party topics that Sections 3.1 to 3.7 of EBA/GL/2019/04 used to address, so in-scope firms follow DORA for those areas. ISO 27001 is a voluntary, certifiable information security standard that can support both, as many of its controls overlap. Neither replaces Section 3.8, which deals specifically with security measures for payment service users.
How do we comply with the retained guidelines?
Start by confirming whether your national supervisor applies EBA/GL/2019/04 as amended and to which of your services. Then document processes for customer security guidance, payment function controls, spending limit adjustments, transaction alerts, security notices and customer support. Assign owners, keep the guidance current as threats change, and retain evidence that each measure operates, so you can show your supervisor the guidelines are applied.
Does OneClickComply support EBA/GL/2019/04?
EBA/GL/2019/04 is mapped in OneClickComply's control library and is available on request rather than as a live framework today. Once enabled, you can manage the Section 3.8 measures with automated evidence collection, AutoComplete policies and continuous monitoring, and reuse that work across other frameworks. Our in-house audit team can also help you interpret how the guidelines fit with DORA.
Related standards
All standards- CCN-STIC 825: ENS and ISO 27001 Certifications GuideGuidance · EU
- NIS2 Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690Regulation · EU
- EU AI ActRegulation · EU
- Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)Regulation · EU
- EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)Regulation · EU
- Spain National Security Framework (ENS, Royal Decree 311/2022)Regulation · EU
- BSI C5:2020Standard · EU
- EU Cyber Resilience Act AnnexesRegulation · EU
Get EBA/GL/2019/04 ready, not stressed
Automate controls, gather evidence continuously and stay audit-ready, all on one platform.